Solar Geometry

A Case for the Divine Design of the Solar System

  • Home
  • The Concepts
    • The Solar System: Chance or Design?
    • The Solar Geometries
    • Solar Geometry Proofs
    • Earth and the Relationship to Phi
    • The Kepler 3/4 Connection
    • Planetary Distance Calculations
    • Variances in Solar Geometry
    • Bennett vs NASA
    • Divine Design of the Moon
  • The Vision
    • Original Drawings
    • Mercury
    • Mercury and Venus
    • Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars
    • Mercury, Venus and Earth
    • Mars and Jupiter
    • Original Drawings – Mercury at Aphelion, Mars and Jupiter
    • Tai Chi
    • Ancient Knowledge
      • Hindu Temple
      • The Djed
  • About
    • Alan Bennett
    • Author’s Perspectives
    • Tribute to Alan Bennett
    • Links to Other Sites
    • Gurdjieffisms
    • Site Map
  • Contact

Kepler’s laws vs Bennett and NASA

Solar Geometry and Kepler’s Laws

Johannes Kepler (1571-1630) led science to make a complete break with the Ptolemaic tradition that held to a geocentric view of the universe.  He discovered several very important principles that describe the motion of the planets around the sun.  Known as Kepler’s laws, they are:

(1) All planets’ orbits are ellipses with the Sun at one focus.
(2) Planets in their orbits sweep out equal areas in equal time regardless of where in their orbits they are.
(3) The square of a planet’s orbital period is proportional to the cube of its average distance from the Sun.  If the period (P) is in years and distance or radius (R) is in Astronomical Units, then the constant k = 1, and P squared = k times R cubed for all planets.

Compare the application of Kepler’s Third Law to the data published by NASA and that derived from Solar Geometry:

Kepler’s 3rd Law using published data shows inaccuracies

Planet Orbital
period
around
the
Sun
in days
Distance
from
Sun
in AU
Relative
orbital
period
where
Mercury
= 1
Relative
distance
where
Mercury
= 1
Period
squared
Distance
cubed
Error
per
Kepler’s
3rd
Law
Mercury 87.97 0.3870989 1.00000 1.00000 1.000 1.000 0.000
Venus 224.70 0.7233320 2.55428 1.86860 6.524 6.524 0.000
Earth 365.26 1.0000001 4.15210 2.58332 17.240 17.240 0.000
Mars 686.98 1.5236623 7.80925 3.93611 60.984 60.982 0.003
Jupiter 4,332.71 5.2033630 49.25213 13.44195 2,425.772 2,428.770 -2.998

 

As you can see, the published data doesn’t even conform exactly to Kepler’s Third Law, and thus cannot be totally accurate.

Kepler’s 3rd Law using Solar Geometry

Here are the relationships from Kepler’s Third Law as derived from Solar Geometry:

Planet Predicted
orbital
period
around
the
Sun
in days
Distance
from
Sun
in AU
Relative
orbital
period
where
Mercury
= 1
(Dist^1.5)
Relative
distance
where
Mercury
= 1
Period
squared
Distance
cubed
Error
per
Kepler’s
3rd
Law
Mercury 87.97 0.3871010 1.00000 1.00000 1.000 1.000 0.000
Venus 224.24 0.7223402 2.54904 1.86603 6.498 6.498 0.000
Earth 365.26 1.0000001 4.15206 2.58331 17.240 17.240 0.000
Mars 687.06 1.5238067 7.81013 3.93646 60.998 60.998 0.000
Jupiter 4,334.44 5.2026014 49.27135 13.43991 2,427.666 2,427.666 0.000

Because the orbital periods are derived here, there is no deviation in the relationships per Kepler’s Third Law when using Solar Geometry, yet the results are amazingly close to those published by NASA.

Click for next page

In a time when most astronomers were attempting to explain planetary motion through a complicated set of circular orbits within orbits, or epicycles, Kepler sought simplicity and order that he assumed by faith would be there, and said that he was merely “thinking God’s thoughts after Him.”

©1999 Alan Bennett